The Impact of Two Standards-Based Mathematics Curricula on Student Achievement in Massachusetts

By Julie E. Riordan and Pendred E. Noyce

In Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
July 2001, Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 368 - 398
http://my.nctm.org/eresources/article_summary.asp?URI=JRME2001-07-368a
(Presented in PDF format. Subscription required; see below.)

ABSTRACT (from journal):
 
Since the passage of the Education Reform Act in 1993, Massachusetts has developed curriculum frameworks and a new statewide testing system. As school districts align curriculum and teaching practices with the frameworks, standards-based mathematics programs are beginning to replace more traditional curricula. This paper presents a quasi-experimental study using matched comparison groups to investigate the impact of one elementary and one middle school standards-based mathematics program in Massachusetts on student achievement. The study compares statewide standardized test scores of fourth-grade students using Everyday Mathematics and eighth-grade students using Connected Mathematics to test scores of demographically similar students using a mix of traditional curricula. Results indicate that students in schools using either of these standards-based programs as their primary mathematics curriculum performed significantly better on the 1999 statewide mathematics test than did students in traditional programs attending matched comparison schools. With minor exceptions, differences in favor of the standards-based programs remained consistent across mathematical strands, question types, and student sub-populations.

Go to full article.
* Note that a subscription to the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education is required. See NCTM web site for more information on joining NCTM and subscribing to the journal.
* This article is presented in PDF format; click here for more information.